Which theory would be most appropriate for a study focused on coping behaviors in patients with serious diagnoses?

Middle-range theory is the most suitable for a study focused on coping behaviors in patients with serious diagnoses because it specifically addresses phenomena that are concrete and manageable within a practical research context. Such theories are developed to reflect specific aspects of human experience, making them particularly useful in clinical settings where nuanced understanding of patient behaviors is essential.

When exploring coping behaviors, middle-range theories can provide frameworks that help to examine variables related to emotional responses, adaptation mechanisms, and social interactions in patients facing serious health challenges. These theories often bridge the gap between grand theories, which are more abstract and broad, and specific observational studies, facilitating focused research that can lead to actionable strategies in patient care.

Other theories, such as grand theories, tend to address broad concepts and may not target the specifics of coping mechanisms, while explanatory theories are more concerned with establishing cause-and-effect relationships rather than exploring behaviors in depth. Normative theories generally focus on ideals and prescriptions about how things should be, which might not align with the specific, empirical investigation of coping strategies in a clinical population. Thus, middle-range theory provides an appropriate balance of specificity and applicability for this type of research.